10/19/2021 0 Comments Good C++ Editor For Mac
Master PDF Editor for Mac. Because of this freedom, and also because we develop C++ for many different platforms — including Linux, macOS, and Windows — the number of tools we use to write C++ code is significant.8. Code::Blocks is a free IDE for Linux, Apple Mac OS X, and Microsoft Windows.The PSPDFKit codebase is not tied to any particular IDE, which means our developers are free to use their IDE or text editor of choice.I’ll also share their pros and cons based on the experience we have using them. You can convert PDFs to other formats, including Word and Excel.In this blog post, I’ll summarize what we consider to be the most interesting C++ IDEs and text editors as of 2020. Pros: It can be used to edit both text and images.
Good C++ Editor Mac OS XCLionCLion is a C++ IDE developed by JetBrains. Within this group of tools, we want to highlight JetBrain’s CLion (multiplatform), Xcode (macOS), and Visual Studio (Windows). These are programs that include many different things required during development, such as a text editor, an integrated debugger, and different code assistance features that make browsing a big codebase an easier task. This is because parsing C++ templates is a complex problem. To ensure this works seamlessly, we configure CLion to always use a specific version of clang-tidy and clang-format and not what it comes bundled with, because it’s important that every developer on the team lints and formats the codebase in the same way.However, one of the problems we’ve encountered with CLion pertains to performance: The time it takes to completely index an entire project can be very long, especially if the code has a high number of C++ templates. These features are important in a large C++ codebase like the PSPDFKit one, because developers are usually not completely familiar with the part of code they are working on, and being able to navigate the code in a variety of ways helps them understand it more quickly.CLion also integrates well with some linting tools we use, including clang-tidy and clang-format. CLion’s support for CMake projects is very good, so you usually don’t need to spend a lot of time getting a CMake-based project working.CLion provides many different code assistance features that give users the ability to complete code, go to the definition of any symbol, search for code references, and navigate class hierarchies. We don’t think indexing a large-scale C++ project in Xcode is particularly slow, and the IDE remains functional while the project is indexing. The integrated debugger (LLDB) is also easy to set up and use.Here’s an article where we describe how we extended LLDB to work better for our C++ codebase. We use Xcode because it’s tightly integrated with other languages we use in our PSPDFKit for iOS product: Objective C, Objective C++, and Swift. XcodeXcode is a C++ IDE developed by Apple. JetBrains continually invests a lot of resources into improving CLion’s performance, so it’s important to always check for the latest version. This page on performance tuning provides some helpful tips. Microsoft outlook for mac version 1533 set up bellsouth emailWe have been able to create some extensions for linting our documentation and formatting our code that we share with the iOS team, but overall, we think the set of things in Xcode that can officially be extended is still limited. For example, Xcode provides good support for jumping to a definition and calling references, but the only refactoring that is supported out of the box is symbol renaming.Another downside to Xcode is it’s not as extensible as other IDEs, and that complicates the integration of code formatting and linting tools. Meanwhile, in this article, we describe how Xcode indexing works and how you can make it work better for your project.The main disadvantage we see in Xcode compared to other IDEs is that the code assistance features are not as powerful. Additionally, although we think Visual Studio’s integrated debugger is powerful and easy to use, we’ve had some problems when trying to debug multiple languages in the same session. For C++, we especially like Visual Studio’s build analysis tools, which help us discover and fix subtle problems that slow down our builds, such as an excessive number of header #includes.Although Visual Studio’s support for C++ is good, we usually need to complement it with third-party extensions like Visual Assist in order to match other IDEs. One example of this is ReSharper, which improves the C# code assistance provided by Visual Studio with interesting refactorings like the ability to extract interfaces and move up member functions. We find it’s useful to debug multiple languages in the same session, because our Windows product has layers implemented in different languages.Visual Studio also supports a rich set of extensions. Another plus about Visual Studio is that debugging for C++, C#, and JavaScript is integrated. We like that Visual Studio supports the languages we use to develop our Windows product along with C++, we also use C# and JavaScript. Some benefits we see in using text editors to develop in C++ is that they tend to be faster, they are available for multiple platforms, and they are usually free and open source.In the next section, I’ll briefly explain how LSP works with C++ (with Visual Studio Code as its “gold standard” implementation). Thanks to the Language Server Protocol (LSP), the line between a text editor and an IDE has been blurred, and many text editors support advanced features such as code completion and name refactoring.The main text editor that supports LSP is Visual Studio Code, although the protocol is also implemented by less popular text editors like Vim, Sublime Text, Atom, and Emacs. Text Editors for C++ DevelopmentSome people at PSPDFKit prefer to use a simple text editor to develop in C++. Another disadvantage is that adding LSP support to text editors usually requires a non-trivial amount of configuration. Neovim has supported LSP natively since this PR, there’s a popular extension for Atom, and Sublime Text also has support for LSP.The main disadvantage of LSP-based editors is that, even though a lot of code assistance features are supported, things like refactoring are still not as complete as they are in full-featured IDEs. Other Text EditorsThanks to LSP, many other text editors have gained “IDE-like” capabilities without being proper IDEs. If developers are free to use the environment they are more familiar with, they’ll be happier, they will probably stay longer at your company, and they will ultimately be more productive. However, we’re always interested in opportunities where PSPDFKit could contribute to help make the C++ ecosystem better.Our main recommendation is that your organization does not tie projects to any particular text editor or IDE, and that the company fosters a culture of maintaining a set of small project-specific extensions for developers who use a particular IDE. However, we’re pleased to see there’s recently been a lot of innovation regarding C++ tooling, so it’s safe to say it’s the best possible time to develop in C++, as there are more options than ever.That said, we also have some criticism for example, we don’t think C++ tooling is at the same level as tooling for other languages is (Java being a prime example).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorMatt ArchivesCategories |